Easily
the most profound aspect of mass customized learning is the emphasis on actual
learning and growth, and the ability to group students based on ability and
readiness rather than age allows instructors to create a deep and authentic
curriculum. The most common criticism I often hear of MCL is that critics often
fear the trend of grouping students by ability rather than age will result in
students staying in school longer than they would have otherwise. The best
response is often the reverse of this, while some students may spend more time
in school others will have earned their diploma much sooner, at the same time those
who spend more time in school will certainly be much more prepared earn a
better job or go to college than they otherwise would. Personally one of my
favorite aspects of MCL is the emphasis on using evidence to prove proficiency,
typically these artifacts are collected throughout the unit or semester and
give a much more in depth picture of how the student is developing and what
they have learned rather than a single test that could be skewed by multiple
variables.
No comments:
Post a Comment