For me my largest
take-away from the authentic curriculum presentation was the concept of making
authentic curriculum and the standards align.
Previously my concern with authentic curriculum was that it would be so
difficult to make something authentic, unique, and individual fit into the
actual standards that it was an exercise of futility, though of course I would
have never said authentic curriculum was futile, far from it really. The
presentation conveyed the idea that as an instructor you can first make your
content and curriculum as authentic and individualized as you need to make you
students engaged and have the content sink in. From this point you make the standards
fit your curriculum rather than let
the standards dictate your instruction. A quality instructor should never let the
standards create a contortion act out of their instruction, instead they should
strive to make an act out of the standards to make their classroom as authentic
as possible.
It seems like such a
small change in teaching philosophy, but I tend to think it will result into a
profoundly powerful paradigm shift in my teaching philosophy, but even beyond
this change there was so much more going on with the presentation that was
worth mentioning. Authentic curriculum appears to me as a considerably
attractive form of instruction largely because of its emphasis on the pragmatic
side of instruction where I as the teacher work mostly to build an excellent learning
community and take a role as a facilitator of instruction allowing the class to
become much more student centered and led.
No comments:
Post a Comment